Friday 13 September 2013

Demystifying the Cowboy Through His Song: How Cowboy Poetry and Music Create a Common Language Between Multiple-Use Conserservationists and Foerever-Wild Preservationists to Meet the Goals of Sustainable Agriculture

Ladd, K.Y., and R. Brain. 2013. Demystifying the Cowboy Through His Song: How Cowboy Poetry and Music Create a Common Language Between Multiple-Use Conservationists and Forever-Wild Preservationists to Meet the Goals of Sustainable Agriculture. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37:659-671 doi: 10.1080/21683565.2013.763886.

There exists a common misconception in life that farmers, ranchers, cowboys and the like are self-proclaimed ‘conquerors of the land’. The reality however is that the vast majority have a deep respect for their land and are interested not just in economic profitability, but also environmental stewardship. This misconception may have arisen from the apparent negative views towards outside interference from governments and conservationists. While each group have their own best interests in mind, they seldom appreciate the efforts and ideals of farmers and therefore fail in attempts to communicate their ideas effectively.


Conservation groups often battle with the agricultural sector; one side arguing for the creation and preservation of natural biodiversity and the other striving to make a living while providing food for many (including, one can assume, many of the conservationists themselves). Many of these opposing groups however would experience long-term success in their respective missions if they worked together rather than apart in situations when they share common goals. Bridging the two sides however requires a common language. This article centres on one such language that has arisen in a surprising place: cowboy poetry and music.

As it is such a fundamental element in their lives, the majority of cowboy poems tell of a connection to the beauty of the land and the animals that share the land with them. These works help to create a sense of place and meaning that creates sustainable ideals that are more complex than those derived from economic means. This is because the art and music come from and address human values including cultural practices, social interactions and human feelings which greatly influence individuals, social groups and institutions. Art has also been shown as important medium for communicating scientific information; finding bridges between the scientific community and the general public is arguably equally as important as any other separate community groups (Curtis, Reid, & Ballard, 2012).

Organized cowboy music festivals occur right across the USA having originated in Elko, Nevada in1985. At these festivals, traditions are passed on, ideas are shared and community spirits blossom. Trough the proclaiming of environmental values and traditions at these festivals, the shared goals of the multiple-use conservationists and the forever-wild preservationists are highlighted and can begin to coalesce. A key factor in the effectiveness of this medium in providing outreach beyond the farming community is that it is both entertaining and morally and intellectually supportive. Non-ranchers and environmentalists alike have a place where they can appreciate and support farmers and their actions, providing the framework towards realising and achieving common goals. Those who attend these festivals find others who value sustainability as well as new ways to practice sustainability conveniently. This both increases the likelihood of them continuing these behaviours as well as making them more likely to shape and pass on these attitudes and behaviours to future generations. This driving force in community spirit at these events helps forge bonds between different groups; by interacting on this level, they can better understand each other’s viewpoints in an environment that promotes expression and individuality. Perhaps the best way to put it, as the authors say, is ‘in short, art builds a bridge between different lifestyles’.

Discussion group reception

One of the more novel aspects of this paper is the fact that it explores the use of creative outlets in approaching social challenges. Communication is science is a large aspect of what we do; effective communication can be the difference between the ‘right’ ideas being taken-up by people and suffering negative backlash from people when there is a communication breakdown. 

As we saw in the above paper, encouraging people and groups to adopt creative outlets for important aspects of their lives can greatly facilitate understanding between different social groups. What I was most interested in was discussing how we may apply the concepts from this article in a more local sense.

The misconceptions raised in the article are also widespread in New Zealand, as are the many cases of negative reactions towards external interferences in farmer’s livelihoods. Check out some of the links below for examples:


In New Zealand, we do not have cowboy festivals at anything near the scales seen overseas. Here instead our farming community congregates annually at A&P shows, which sadly are more tuned into promoting agriculture and it’s service industries rather than of encouraging the encouraging the creative expression of individuals. If we were to attempt to introduce change into such a farming institution as the A&P show, we must proceed with the ‘the end of the wedge’.

Finding ways to encourage expression and communication between farming groups and conservationists and other communities was a reoccurring theme of the group discussion.  The need for effective communication and education to raise awareness and support for collaborative action and behaviour change is becoming more important in the context of global environmental issues, including biodiversity loss (Curtis et al., 2012). One such application involved the Banks Peninsula Conservation Trust, a non-profit organisation that promotes conservation and sustainability on the Peninsula through working closely with landowners, agencies and other community groups. The Trust has the potential for creating a platform for farmers to come along and share their particular views and insights about what it is like to live their lives. These events could be used to give positive feedbacks to farmers about the good work that they do, letting them know that we want to work with them to achieve common conservation goals.

The role of Lincoln University in all of this was also mentioned. Just like with encouraging the communication between different community groups, so too could we encourage communication between different research departments. This would benefit everyone, including ourselves, as there are many cases of different groups working on the same topic from different angles(e.g. shelter belts), with little or no communication on matters. Lincoln University has a very large influence on the farming community, and the numerous community education days are a good opportunity to communicate the values of conservation to the general farming public.

Action points from the meeting:
1. Enquire into exactly what the university means by ‘best practices’ on its model dairy farms; in particular, enquiring is it uses environmental sustainability as a measure of success
2. Invite farmers and other professionals from the agricultural sector to speak at the Eco-pathways seminars so as to gain an appreciation for what they do
3. Banks Peninsula Conservation Trust: Focus on Farms Art, Music and Poetry events

Questions:
What are the most important ideas that we want to put across to the agricultural community in regards to ecology and/or sustainability?

How might we convey conservation ideals to those that do not identify with not only science, but art and poetry as well?



9 comments:

  1. The agriculture-conservation issue is really a trade-off. Simplistically, money is what ultimately drives one side and the intrinsic value of biodiversity is what drives the other side. Given this difference in motivators, we might pragmatically think that one of the best ways to tip the scales in favour of the conservation side is to use money to balance things out. However, there is lots of research that indicates that there are many factors that motivate particular land management behaviours by farmers. Not only are there financial motivations, but there are broader socio-economic factors, as well as variation in the way farmers perceive their land and management issues. For example, in Canterbury different types of farmers (dairy, sheep/beef, amenity-block owners) have considerably different views on the utility of having woody vegetation on their properties. These views also differ depending on how old farmers are and how much education they have. So while financial incentive might help, other factors are important too. In fact, in other countries where they have used financial incentives to try and encourage farmers to increase “biodiversity” on their farmland (eg. agri-environment schemes in Europe), there is equivocal evidence as to whether these schemes have actually achieved that much. Overall, the main problem is that we really haven’t done enough research to know how to design and implement such schemes and it may be that each region might require a different approach. It may be that connecting people through art is the way to go! Do we need more social scientists to help us work out how to connect the two groups?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is quite a lot of evidence to suggest that money is a poor motivator and that in some situations offering to pay someone to do the right thing (or even something they were going to do anyway) can be counterproductive. If I were to offer to pay you to follow this link and read the article you find there, would you be more or less likely to do it than if I had not offered a financial incentive?

      Delete
  2. This is way off topic, but I found this example of the use of poetry to connect with the experiences of other people (in this case people with dementia) to be a fascinating demonstration of the power of art, and particularly poetry, to illuminate the inner worlds of those around us, although I think we need to be careful not to assume that by reading these poems we will gain a real understand of what it is like to have dementia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interestingly enough I created my undergrad major around this field of study. I combined my love for science and art into my own interdisciplinary major titles "Environmental Media and Human Perception." I am a huge advocate for art and the environment since there really is no way for anyone to explain things in a more meaningful way than art. I am an aspiring photographer and have taken thousands of photos of many subjects, here in New Zealand I have found inspiration in the environment.

      In my opinion the best way to present data is through art and that is why there are many advances in science and technology that allow the average person to view things that scientists see. From a simple telescope to high power cameras, and the one and most abused tool- the internet image and video search.

      In terms of literature poetry is also a great tool. I am also an aspiring poet so I can relate my experience with these individuals.

      Delete
  3. I wonder if this is perhaps more of a two way street than the authors seem to indicate?
    While there’s certainly no denying that farmers are often negatively stereotyped by ecologists, I believe that this is a reciprocal situation. The term ‘scientist’ still conjures up a lot of public mistrust (particularly in older generations); people still associate the word with reclusive, lab-coat-wearing types who are out of touch with the real world (or at the other end of the spectrum we ecologists can also get classified as “hippies” (as my agricultural friends so nicely put it)). I believe that in order to have effective communication we need to break down the stereotypes on both sides of the debate… though to be fair I have no idea how to go about this. One of the ideas I liked best from the discussion was the idea to just listen to the farmers concerns/ideas in a scenario where they don’t feel like we’re forcing our ideas down their throats.

    Would anyone who's actually dealt with farmers first hand care to share what you thought their perception was of us? (most of my assumptions are based on second hand info)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have yet to have a practical working experience with farmers, but I have talked to a couple of the older generation lads who definitely seem to hold a grudge against scientists. The two in particular I have talked to had negative past experiences with members of the local government, and it seems have now branded all outsiders as a nuisance.

      It upsets me to think that it could be one small experience such as the threat of 'land grabs' that this blog highlighted, that could be preventing us budding scientists from even helping with improved land management.

      Of course it is not that simple, there are many hurdles to be crossed. I feel that at least the foundations of the bridge could be laid down - be it through interaction at the small A&P shows or invitations to ecology events. Enough talking lets get ideas rolling!

      Delete
    2. And on top of that I think education should be both ways. If we want to connect to the farmers we need to understand how they see the land and what they want to get from it. Having the compulsory agriculture/ecology introduction paper for all Lincoln students is a fantastic start.

      Delete
    3. I have not dealt with farmers but I have dealt with ecologists. Basically it's the same thing.

      The one thing we must remember is that we are all specialists in our own field, whatever that field may be. Also there always is a misunderstanding and lack of respect for the others field. The misunderstandings arise when "simple" concepts and language is not known by the other. Perfect example was last summer (northern hemisphere summer) during my Sea Education Program one of my shipmates asked me "why do you poor people hate us rich people?" I replied by saying "we don't hate you, we just don't understand each other." After talking with her for a while I believe I gave her my perspective as a low-income individual and she gave me her perspective as an affluent individual.

      I will say that the conversation was not easy and there were times were I wanted to walk away but I resisted.


      What I am trying to get at is that there needs to be some type of space where both individuals can voice their opinions, some type of forum, so that each others profession/lifestyle/beliefs is demystified.

      I have looked at other instances where there were different stakeholders involved (fishers, long distance runners, scientists, residents, bird watchers) and they held monthly forums to discuss how they felt about certain environmental actions in an area that affected their lifestyles. The forums will continue for the next couple of years (50 years total) so a continuous dialogue would be nice.

      First and foremost we must have a spark. Some type of get together where people present their work/findings/lifestyle. Then the conversations will happen automatically.

      Are we really serious about hosting the farmers? That would be a good start.

      Delete
    4. Art and science have always gone hand in hand. I might not be an expert in either field but I know for a fact that there needs to be a bridge between the two disciplines since art is used by scientists but sometimes only other scientists can look at it and appreciate it while the people who might be directly affected by what the art is representing have no chance of access to it.

      This extends to the access of scientific papers. First and foremost, the more juicy and interesting papers that I have seen are restricted to a very specific audience and require membership. Then there is the language barrier. I'm not going to lie sometimes I feel lost in a sea of super specific words used to describe simple processes that I have known all my life. I am told that there is a steep learning curve and I acknowledge that but isn't that an obstacle? I am not just speaking for myself but for others that could possibly benefit from this knowledge. They are left out because their own ways are seen as un-scientific because they lack data, graphs and proofs.

      Enough of my monologue though. As an individuals that floats between the two disciplines (art and science) I know that there are many similarities and many goals can can be aligned to assist in conservation efforts, since art is used for public stimulation which can lead to action. What we need to prevent is an extreme use such as PETA and other organizations that use the shock factor so much that people become immune to the images.

      Delete