Melo, F.P.; Arroyo-Rodríguez, V.; Fahrig, L.;
Martínez-Ramos, M.; Tabarelli, M. 2013, Trends in Ecology and Evolution.
Loss of biodiversity, forest fragmentation and habitat
degradation are common features in tropical biotas, primarily as a result of
human activity. In the past, conservation efforts have been based on preserving
large intact areas of pristine rainforest, however this is becoming
increasingly challenging (Melo et al., 2013). The management of
human-modified-landscapes (HML) has been identified as an opportunity to
conserve biodiversity, whereby productive non-degradable agricultural landscapes
coexist with natural tropical forest (Chazdon et al., 2009; Melo et al., 2013).
Secondary (regenerating) forests, as a part of the HML model, have been suggested
by some as a ‘Noah’s Ark' for biodiversity. As a result, the primary goal is a somewhat favourable
situation for both economy and the conservation of biodiversity.
This article was written for the purpose to provide a conceptual model, which
examines four possible successional trajectories (natural, conservation,
functional and degraded) and examines the fundamental forces affecting the dynamics
of HML’s. For example, Melo et al. (2013) identified that there
is no guarantee that forest transition (net loss to net gain) driven by urbanisation
and land abandonment will ultimately lead to further forest regeneration. Whether
or not secondary forests will support the original suite of taxa, or retain
improvised fractions of biodiversity will be influenced by processes, such as
anthropogenic disturbance in the surrounding landscape.
The actual potential for maintaining biodiversity in HML’s remains controversial and uncertain, considering the current land uses such as extensive logging and more commonly slash-and-burn agriculture. Within the last the last 50 years alone, the expansion of agriculture has occurred at the expense of mature and regenerating forests, with less than 30% of the original forest cover remaining in developing tropical countries. Furthermore, the potential for secondary forests to become a target for land clearance in the future was identified as problematic (Melo et al., 2013). However, Hawes et al. (2008) reported that small patches of regenerating forest are able to retain high levels of biodiversity of several taxa, while supporting valuable ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration and a sustainable hydrological supply (Chazdon et al., 2009). Melo et al. (2013) concluded that whether or not these landscapes shift towards sustainable or unsustainable systems will largely depend on agricultural practices.
Discussion group
reception
One of the key points raised by the EcoEvo group is that the
authors took an optimistic approach on HML’s, which was interpreted as HML’s
may be the best alternative conservation option. While conserving pristine
forest is ideal, regenerating secondary forest is better than no forest at all.
In developing tropical countries, economic growth and productivity are often
prioritised above conservation values; therefore an integrated landscape
approach seems the only way to move forward, while maintaining biodiversity,
ecosystem services and sustainability of rural livelihoods (Chazdon et al., 2009). As developing countries
become more affluent, farming could possibly become intensified, resulting in
higher productivity while allowing marginally productive areas to be valued as
conservation remnants. This approach would
require inter-disciplinary co-operation and extensive management to ensure
sustainability, in rapidly changing tropical landscapes (Chazdon et al., 2009).
There may be lessons that tropical countries could learn from developed western societies such as New Zealand. It was mentioned that if the Canterbury plains resembled the HML’s in the tropics, it would be a vast
improvement of the current landscape. In
New Zealand, a large proportion of the fertile land has been cleared for
agriculture, and remnant patches of native forest are few and far between.
However, some areas such as along rivers, steep slopes and gullies are not
generally productive, and are now being valued for their restoration potential.
It seems that rarity is valued. In temperate countries large efforts are being
made to restore the landscape, while conservation is often traded-off for
productivity in tropical landscapes.
Questions
Is landscape restoration possible for abandoned and degraded
farmland on such a large scale?
How important are conceptual models for identifying conservation priorities and are there limitations to their practicality and relevance?
Could channelling limited resources into conserving secondary forest achieve better outcomes than using them solely to conserve primary rainforest?
How important are conceptual models for identifying conservation priorities and are there limitations to their practicality and relevance?
Could channelling limited resources into conserving secondary forest achieve better outcomes than using them solely to conserve primary rainforest?
References
Chazdon,
R.L.; Harvey, C.A.; Komar, O.; Griffith, D.M.; Ferguson, B.G.; Martínez-Ramos,
M.; Morales, H.; Nigh, R.; Soto-Pinto, L.; Van Breugel, M.; Philpott, S.M.
2009. Beyond Reserves: A Research Agenda for Conserving Biodiversity in
Human-modified Tropical Landscapes. Biotropica
41: 142-153.
Hawes, J.; Barlow, J.; Gardner, T.A.;
Peres, C.A. 2008. The value of forest strips for understorey birds in an
Amazonian plantation landscape. Biological
Conservation 141: 2262-2278.
Melo, F.P.;
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V.; Fahrig, L.; Martínez-Ramos, M.; Tabarelli, M. 2013. On
the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends in ecology & evolution.
Personally I think that channelling resources into conserving secondary forest OVER primary forest is a risky business. While it’s certainly better than nothing, HMLs do not guarantee long term biodiversity. One thing which bothered me about this article (which I believe was mentioned at discussion group also) is the failure to acknowledge the idea of extinction lags/extinction debts (see ref). This could really mess with some of the projections proposed in this article.
ReplyDeleteKuussaari, M., Bommarco, R., Heikkinen, R. K., Helm, A., Krauss, J., Lindborg, R. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2009) Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 564-571.
I think that when it comes to the potential for HML restoration, the spatial and temporal scale is really key (i.e. in terms of seed source persistence, ability to disperse etc.). Potentially in areas where the degradation is spatially and temporally extensive (aka the Canterbury plains) there will need to be active restoration input to get the ecosystem back on track (rather than the natural restoration/regeneration implied by this paper).
One final thing this paper made me consider (which is quite possibly totally irrelevant) is the cultural attachment to HMLs. I was thinking in regard to the Port Hills which are dominated by tussock grassland. Technically the tussock grassland is a HML, yet people campaign to keep the hills like this because they have always known them like this? Could a similar effect occur in tropical areas where there has been long term habitat modification?
I also considered the cultural side of HMLs, and I wouldnt say that it is irrelevant at all. HMLs are typically those areas that are in close proximity to urban/anthropomorphic environments, and therefore may be the areas that many people identify with, like the tussock grasslands in your example. Having conservation efforst in these areas could idealy serve as both a benefit to the environment as well as a benefit to the community through eductaiton. Riccarton bush is an example of this; this seemingly insignificant patch of 'forest' is the last bastion of resislince for many species in the canterbury plains, yet it also is used as an education tool for conservation. If we didnt have this, would perhaps even less people care about conservation in the area?
DeleteWhen resources for conservation efforts are limited, I think that at least some of it should go towards community education in the form of conservation of HMLs. In thin way we can foster the development of community awareness of conservation efforts in order to retain support for more remote and large-scale conservation efforts
I agree with you Jenny. I wonder how much the issue relates to what we talked about today: what we say as scientists in our ‘public conversations’ and what we say in our ‘science conversations’. If we promote the idea that HMLs are ‘good enough’ for conserving biodiversity, then that’s what we might get stuck with. I don’t think that we know enough about many systems (particularly tropical systems) to say what the important spatial and temporal scales are for the majority of species, so this is something that needs serious work. The framework presented in the paper might be a theoretical start on some aspects of that, so in that sense, I think it’s potentially useful.
ReplyDeleteHMLs are interesting in that they are an ecosystem. By taking away the human aspect we are in essence taking away a link within the ecosystem, the link might be weak or strong but it definitely has an effect on the ecosystem, whether it is positive or negative depends on the goals for a specific area. I personally believe that HMLs have been an integral part of our ecosystem and will continue to be if we intend to live in the areas where we currently live.
DeleteGardens a great example. Gardens provide us with an opportunity to either help or hurt our ecosystem. Gardens can be composed of either native species or non-native species, or a mix. Native species can help boost diversity by attracting native birds and insects that can also aid in dispersal of pollen and seeds. If we chose to plant non-native species maintenance can go up an cost us money. Lawns are a perfect example.
In the Residential Red Zone in Christchurch we see this phenomenon play out. As people left their homes, their gardens began to take on a life of their own. Without management the gardens are all in a state of succession. Some have the addition of silt from the liquefaction. The seed bank is showing its true colors a natives and invasives begin to pop up.
The sad part is that many of the homes are being demolished and our test areas demolished at the same time.
We must not ignore that there are super manipulated environments and if we take the human element out then we might as well be shooting ourselves in the foot. We must learn the types of management going on and how they affect the ecosystem before we decide whether the human element is helping or hurting the environment.
This article raised a valid issue about how we are approaching the conservation of threatened ecosystems. If we begin to favour HMLs over trying to protect large scale habitats are we not lowering the bar for conservation? I can see that perhpas HMLs would be a great way to restore and maintain natural fragments in areas such as Canterbury where we have depleted our natural old-growth forest cover to something extreme like 1% (correct me if I'm wrong!). But I think it would be better to focus more resources into policy making to protect the larger untouched areas of forest in Asia and South America. Then again this might just be another far-fetched idea like the Kyoto protocol- look where that's got us.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I wasn't at the discussion group I think this is an interesting topic and raises a good idea. It needs to be remembered that if we start conserving secondary forests over primary forests we don't end up 'settling' for this lower standard of conservation but any conservation is better than no conservation right?
ReplyDeleteI like Everto's example of the Christchurch redzone as we are looking at these processes in another course. The properties are naturally regenerating but without any management it could easily be taken over by weeds and exotics because these seedlings are appearing just as often as the natives.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete